-91.3%
AMIX vs GLDM
+2.8%
-94.1%
-93.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | +0.8% | -6.4% | -5.9% |
| 7D | -25.5% | +1.9% | -27.4% | -26.0% |
| 30D | -56.2% | -1.7% | -54.5% | -55.8% |
| 3M | -87.4% | -3.5% | -83.9% | -87.2% |
| 6M | -80.9% | -10.1% | -70.8% | -80.7% |
| YTD | -86.8% | -5.0% | -81.8% | -86.4% |
| 1Y | -91.3% | +2.8% | -94.1% | -88.6% |
| All | -91.3% | +2.8% | -94.1% | -88.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling