-99.9%
AMIX vs ENPH
-75.2%
-24.7%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -2.7% | +3.8% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -9.9% | -8.4% | -1.4% | -8.9% |
| 30D | -52.8% | -11.2% | -41.6% | -52.2% |
| 3M | -80.0% | -36.1% | -44.0% | -78.8% |
| 6M | -80.2% | -37.9% | -42.3% | -78.6% |
| YTD | -88.1% | -18.7% | -69.5% | -86.4% |
| 1Y | -91.1% | -9.8% | -81.2% | -89.5% |
| All | -99.9% | -75.2% | -24.7% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling