-99.8%
AMIX vs EAT
+481.8%
-581.6%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | +0.6% | -2.5% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -13.7% | 0.0% | -13.7% | -13.7% |
| 30D | -62.1% | +1.9% | -63.9% | -62.0% |
| 3M | -46.2% | +68.7% | -114.8% | -52.2% |
| 6M | -46.4% | +66.9% | -113.3% | -52.9% |
| YTD | -60.3% | +60.4% | -120.7% | -64.7% |
| 1Y | -79.7% | +44.0% | -123.7% | -82.0% |
| All | -99.8% | +481.8% | -581.6% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling