-99.8%
AMIX vs BBIO
+108.8%
-208.6%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.8% | -2.0% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -0.5% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -50.8% | -10.1% | -40.7% | -49.2% |
| 3M | -46.3% | +12.4% | -58.7% | -46.9% |
| 6M | -49.9% | +15.9% | -65.8% | -51.1% |
| YTD | -60.4% | -0.5% | -59.9% | -60.5% |
| 1Y | -81.7% | +42.2% | -123.9% | -82.8% |
| All | -99.8% | +108.8% | -208.6% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling