+88.0%
AMGN vs NIO
-62.6%
+150.7%
-22.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.6% | 0.0% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -13.0% | +14.2% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -18.3% | +26.1% | +8.7% |
| 3M | +27.3% | -33.2% | +60.5% | +29.4% |
| 6M | +16.8% | -21.5% | +38.3% | +17.6% |
| YTD | +36.3% | -25.5% | +61.8% | +37.4% |
| 1Y | +60.4% | -38.0% | +98.4% | +62.7% |
| All | +88.0% | -62.6% | +150.7% | +93.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling