+42.1%
AMGN vs ALHC
-53.4%
+95.5%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +0.3% | +0.4% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -5.5% | +3.4% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +12.1% | -4.9% | +17.0% | +12.2% |
| 3M | +13.6% | -41.7% | +55.4% | +14.3% |
| 6M | +43.9% | -55.2% | +99.1% | +43.1% |
| YTD | +45.9% | -61.1% | +107.0% | +42.8% |
| 1Y | +42.1% | -53.3% | +95.5% | +35.0% |
| All | +42.1% | -53.4% | +95.5% | +35.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling