+88.3%
AMGN vs ACGL
+34.2%
+54.1%
-22.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.7% | +0.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -0.7% | +1.9% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -1.0% | +8.8% | +8.1% |
| 3M | +27.3% | +11.0% | +16.2% | +24.3% |
| 6M | +16.8% | -0.3% | +17.2% | +16.7% |
| YTD | +36.3% | +2.3% | +34.0% | +35.3% |
| 1Y | +60.4% | +6.4% | +54.1% | +57.9% |
| All | +88.3% | +34.2% | +54.1% | +70.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling