+214.5%
AME vs NIO
-36.7%
+251.1%
-42.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.6% | +3.1% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -13.0% | +13.7% | +1.4% |
| 30D | -6.7% | -18.3% | +11.6% | -5.6% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -33.2% | +37.3% | +6.5% |
| 6M | +1.6% | -21.5% | +23.1% | +2.6% |
| YTD | +16.1% | -25.5% | +41.6% | +17.6% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | -38.0% | +65.3% | +29.9% |
| 3Y | +50.9% | -65.5% | +116.3% | +55.3% |
| 5Y | +81.4% | -90.6% | +172.0% | +94.5% |
| All | +214.5% | -36.7% | +251.1% | +182.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling