+426.8%
AMDL vs PLTD
-77.7%
+504.5%
-68.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +26.8% | -5.5% | +32.3% | +22.6% |
| 7D | +10.3% | +4.2% | +6.0% | +19.0% |
| 30D | -38.3% | +20.8% | -59.1% | -23.5% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -2.6% | -6.2% | -2.6% |
| 6M | -14.4% | -33.1% | +18.7% | -25.4% |
| YTD | +206.9% | -20.0% | +227.0% | +235.9% |
| 1Y | +144.4% | -21.6% | +166.0% | +173.0% |
| All | +426.8% | -77.7% | +504.5% | +199.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling