+95.0%
AMDL vs PENG
+127.9%
-32.9%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +6.4% | +2.8% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +4.5% | +4.5% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -7.1% | +2.7% | +2.0% |
| 3M | -30.5% | -27.3% | -3.2% | -7.7% |
| 6M | +300.9% | +169.6% | +131.3% | +76.0% |
| YTD | +219.9% | +164.6% | +55.3% | +42.3% |
| 1Y | +374.7% | +109.5% | +265.2% | +143.7% |
| All | +95.0% | +127.9% | -32.9% | -15.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling