+136.0%
AMDL vs NIO
-50.3%
+186.3%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +14.3% | -1.2% | +15.5% | +15.1% |
| 7D | +18.5% | -1.8% | +20.3% | +21.3% |
| 30D | -24.2% | -6.6% | -17.6% | -19.7% |
| 3M | +11.5% | -29.9% | +41.4% | +36.0% |
| 6M | -1.0% | -46.6% | +45.6% | +37.0% |
| YTD | +260.3% | -36.5% | +296.7% | +335.8% |
| All | +136.0% | -50.3% | +186.3% | +256.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling