+131.0%
AMDL vs NBIX
+11.4%
+119.6%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.0% | 0.0% | +6.0% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +29.0% | -1.7% | +30.6% | +30.3% |
| 30D | +19.1% | -5.9% | +25.0% | +23.8% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -6.1% | +7.9% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +374.4% | +19.4% | +355.0% | +313.3% |
| YTD | +278.9% | +9.4% | +269.5% | +251.2% |
| 1Y | +510.6% | +7.6% | +503.0% | +469.5% |
| All | +131.0% | +11.4% | +119.6% | +80.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling