+297.4%
AMDL vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+396.6%
-82.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +2.6% | +6.6% | +9.9% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -29.7% | +34.3% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -65.3% | +60.9% | -24.9% |
| 3M | -30.5% | -57.3% | +26.8% | -36.4% |
| 6M | +300.9% | -61.6% | +362.5% | +284.6% |
| YTD | +219.9% | -78.3% | +298.2% | +204.7% |
| 1Y | +374.7% | -30.2% | +405.0% | +580.6% |
| All | +297.4% | -99.3% | +396.6% | +199.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling