+143.3%
AMDL vs LII
-28.3%
+171.6%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | -0.4% | +3.1% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +5.4% | +0.4% | +5.0% | +6.2% |
| 30D | -36.6% | -2.4% | -34.2% | -36.7% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -17.5% | +16.5% | +11.1% |
| 6M | -12.1% | -32.8% | +20.7% | +14.8% |
| YTD | +215.1% | -27.7% | +242.8% | +307.7% |
| All | +143.3% | -28.3% | +171.6% | +220.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling