+95.0%
AMDL vs LH
+60.6%
+34.4%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | -1.4% | +10.6% | +9.6% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -2.5% | +7.0% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +4.3% | -8.7% | -5.8% |
| 3M | -30.5% | +25.5% | -56.0% | -36.2% |
| 6M | +300.9% | +17.0% | +283.9% | +280.7% |
| YTD | +219.9% | +31.3% | +188.7% | +183.9% |
| 1Y | +374.7% | +20.0% | +354.7% | +337.8% |
| All | +95.0% | +60.6% | +34.4% | +50.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling