+15.9%
AMDL vs INFQ
-32.8%
+48.7%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | INFQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.9% | -7.3% | +19.2% | +17.3% |
| 7D | +103.5% | +17.3% | +86.2% | +82.2% |
| 30D | -18.3% | -13.6% | -4.7% | -5.8% |
| 3M | +20.1% | -29.4% | +49.4% | +55.6% |
| 6M | +15.9% | -33.4% | +49.3% | +43.9% |
| All | +15.9% | -32.8% | +48.7% | +43.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INFQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INFQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INFQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INFQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling