+95.0%
AMDL vs GRMN
+96.6%
-1.5%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | -0.1% | +9.3% | +9.2% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -2.9% | +7.4% | +6.1% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -8.4% | +4.0% | -0.1% |
| 3M | -30.5% | +15.0% | -45.5% | -36.7% |
| 6M | +300.9% | +11.2% | +289.7% | +274.7% |
| YTD | +219.9% | +37.7% | +182.2% | +166.6% |
| 1Y | +374.7% | +18.5% | +356.2% | +325.6% |
| All | +95.0% | +96.6% | -1.5% | +111.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling