+95.0%
AMDL vs FND
-58.6%
+153.6%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FND | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +1.7% | +7.5% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -5.2% | +9.8% | +7.4% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -19.9% | +15.5% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -30.5% | +2.7% | -33.2% | -34.0% |
| 6M | +300.9% | -21.7% | +322.6% | +340.5% |
| YTD | +219.9% | -17.5% | +237.4% | +233.8% |
| 1Y | +374.7% | -39.3% | +414.0% | +482.4% |
| All | +95.0% | -58.6% | +153.6% | +147.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FND.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FND return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FND return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FND wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling