+102.5%
AMDL vs CLBK
+54.6%
+47.9%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.6% | -0.5% | -17.0% | -17.3% |
| 7D | +37.2% | +0.9% | +36.3% | +36.8% |
| 30D | -24.0% | +3.4% | -27.4% | -25.4% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -4.3% | +3.3% | +1.5% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +28.4% | -31.6% | -16.9% |
| YTD | +232.2% | +59.4% | +172.8% | +145.4% |
| 1Y | +137.7% | +64.8% | +72.9% | +70.1% |
| All | +102.5% | +54.6% | +47.9% | +47.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling