+126.1%
AMDL vs BRKR
-41.8%
+167.9%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BRKR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | -0.2% | +5.1% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +15.9% | -8.7% | +24.6% | +20.8% |
| 30D | +10.5% | -9.9% | +20.3% | +15.6% |
| 3M | -4.7% | -3.1% | -1.6% | -8.7% |
| 6M | +355.2% | +45.5% | +309.7% | +253.5% |
| YTD | +270.9% | +13.7% | +257.2% | +219.8% |
| 1Y | +499.5% | +67.4% | +432.1% | +304.9% |
| All | +126.1% | -41.8% | +167.9% | +162.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BRKR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BRKR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BRKR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BRKR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling