+331.1%
AMD vs ZTS
-58.8%
+389.9%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -0.6% | +5.3% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -2.0% | +4.6% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +1.9% | -2.8% | -1.1% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -4.0% | -4.7% | -8.4% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -39.1% | +175.5% | +155.6% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -38.8% | +161.8% | +140.7% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | -49.6% | +244.7% | +233.7% |
| All | +331.1% | -58.8% | +389.9% | +408.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling