+95.5%
AMD vs ZTS
-26.9%
+122.4%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | +7.5% | -6.5% | +3.1% |
| 7D | -15.5% | +15.4% | -30.9% | -11.7% |
| 30D | -22.6% | +25.8% | -48.4% | -17.6% |
| 3M | -5.7% | +18.1% | -23.8% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +43.1% | -19.7% | +62.9% | +52.8% |
| YTD | +128.2% | -27.5% | +155.7% | +144.9% |
| 1Y | +95.5% | -26.7% | +122.2% | +110.5% |
| All | +95.5% | -26.9% | +122.4% | +110.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling