+199.0%
AMD vs XLF
+54.7%
+144.4%
-65.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.0% | -0.6% | +11.6% | +11.7% |
| 7D | -11.0% | +1.2% | -12.2% | -12.0% |
| 30D | -30.5% | +6.3% | -36.8% | -35.3% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -0.8% | -7.4% | -7.8% |
| 6M | +6.6% | +11.0% | -4.5% | -7.5% |
| YTD | +109.7% | +5.6% | +104.0% | +92.1% |
| 1Y | +88.9% | +10.8% | +78.1% | +62.6% |
| 3Y | +301.8% | +77.8% | +224.0% | +78.3% |
| All | +199.0% | +54.7% | +144.4% | +63.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling