+231.0%
AMD vs VIK
+228.1%
+2.9%
-57.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +0.3% | +4.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -3.0% | +5.6% | +4.2% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -20.7% | +19.8% | +11.2% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -4.6% | -4.1% | -7.0% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +14.0% | +122.4% | +117.2% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +20.2% | +102.8% | +97.7% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +36.0% | +159.2% | +141.7% |
| All | +231.0% | +228.1% | +2.9% | +68.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling