+234.0%
AMD vs UMC
+226.5%
+7.5%
-27.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.9% | +5.1% | +0.8% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +10.0% | +6.6% | +3.4% | +6.8% |
| 30D | +4.6% | +16.6% | -11.9% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +3.1% | +11.0% | -7.9% | -2.0% |
| 6M | +162.8% | +131.3% | +31.5% | +98.0% |
| YTD | +136.2% | +182.5% | -46.3% | +63.2% |
| 1Y | +234.0% | +222.3% | +11.8% | +114.6% |
| All | +234.0% | +226.5% | +7.5% | +114.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling