+295.7%
AMD vs TTWO
+44.6%
+251.1%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TTWO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.0% | +0.7% | +10.3% | +10.8% |
| 7D | -11.0% | +13.0% | -24.0% | -14.6% |
| 30D | -30.5% | +5.3% | -35.8% | -31.9% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -7.6% | -0.7% | -6.4% |
| 6M | +6.6% | -3.2% | +9.8% | +4.8% |
| YTD | +109.7% | -16.1% | +125.8% | +120.0% |
| 1Y | +88.9% | -14.9% | +103.8% | +96.4% |
| All | +295.7% | +44.6% | +251.1% | +245.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TTWO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TTWO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TTWO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TTWO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling