+350.2%
AMD vs TTWO
+50.4%
+299.8%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TTWO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +0.3% | +4.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -8.8% | +11.4% | +6.1% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -8.6% | +7.7% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -0.9% | -7.8% | -9.8% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -0.5% | +136.8% | +129.4% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -16.1% | +139.1% | +135.9% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | -10.8% | +206.0% | +201.3% |
| All | +350.2% | +50.4% | +299.8% | +242.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TTWO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TTWO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TTWO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TTWO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling