+331.1%
AMD vs TRGP
+252.7%
+78.4%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -1.2% | +5.9% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +0.8% | +1.8% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +11.5% | -12.4% | -4.0% |
| 3M | -8.7% | +9.0% | -17.7% | -11.2% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +20.5% | +115.8% | +120.0% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +59.5% | +63.5% | +85.6% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +77.9% | +117.3% | +133.6% |
| All | +331.1% | +252.7% | +78.4% | +250.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling