+261.9%
AMD vs PLTR
+716.2%
-454.3%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.3% | -9.7% | -7.5% | -14.4% |
| 7D | -28.6% | -21.1% | -7.5% | -23.2% |
| 30D | -37.7% | -19.3% | -18.4% | -33.4% |
| 3M | -16.1% | -2.2% | -13.9% | -15.6% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +14.0% | -0.2% | +7.5% |
| YTD | +88.8% | -12.8% | +101.6% | +91.9% |
| 1Y | +57.8% | -17.5% | +75.3% | +63.0% |
| All | +261.9% | +716.2% | -454.3% | +133.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling