+265.7%
AMD vs PLTD
-77.8%
+343.5%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +4.6% | 0.0% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +5.9% | -3.4% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -11.6% | +10.7% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -29.9% | +21.2% | -16.6% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -28.5% | +164.9% | +120.3% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -20.4% | +143.4% | +122.4% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | -33.3% | +228.4% | +183.0% |
| All | +265.7% | -77.8% | +343.5% | +151.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling