+378.2%
AMD vs NTNX
+80.9%
+297.2%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -2.3% | -1.1% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +10.4% | -3.9% | +14.3% | +11.4% |
| 30D | +6.2% | +1.7% | +4.5% | +5.6% |
| 3M | +11.3% | +31.7% | -20.4% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +147.8% | +69.4% | +78.4% | +112.6% |
| YTD | +135.2% | +26.6% | +108.6% | +119.0% |
| 1Y | +215.7% | -15.2% | +230.9% | +236.1% |
| All | +378.2% | +80.9% | +297.2% | +230.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling