+331.1%
AMD vs NTAP
+149.9%
+181.2%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +0.1% | +4.6% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -0.8% | +3.3% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -0.5% | -0.4% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -8.7% | +4.1% | -12.8% | -10.8% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +88.0% | +48.4% | +59.9% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +75.6% | +47.4% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +58.9% | +136.3% | +120.8% |
| All | +331.1% | +149.9% | +181.2% | +146.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling