+331.1%
AMD vs NSC
+70.9%
+260.2%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NSC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +0.5% | +4.2% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -5.5% | +8.1% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -3.2% | +2.3% | +0.1% |
| 3M | -8.7% | +7.7% | -16.4% | -11.6% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +4.5% | +131.8% | +130.8% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +15.6% | +107.4% | +107.6% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +19.8% | +175.3% | +169.1% |
| All | +331.1% | +70.9% | +260.2% | +211.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NSC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NSC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NSC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NSC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling