+301.8%
AMD vs NOC
+16.8%
+285.0%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.0% | 0.0% | +11.1% | +11.0% |
| 7D | -11.0% | -5.8% | -5.2% | -12.2% |
| 30D | -30.5% | +10.9% | -41.4% | -28.8% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -7.1% | -1.1% | -8.9% |
| 6M | +6.6% | -5.3% | +11.9% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +109.7% | -6.8% | +116.5% | +111.3% |
| 1Y | +88.9% | -6.7% | +95.6% | +90.6% |
| 3Y | +301.8% | +17.2% | +284.6% | +352.6% |
| All | +301.8% | +16.8% | +285.0% | +352.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling