+331.1%
AMD vs NIO
-64.6%
+395.7%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -1.6% | +6.2% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -13.0% | +15.6% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -18.3% | +17.4% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -33.2% | +24.5% | -2.6% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -21.5% | +157.8% | +143.2% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -25.5% | +148.5% | +131.1% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | -38.0% | +233.2% | +213.8% |
| All | +331.1% | -64.6% | +395.7% | +359.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling