+95.5%
AMD vs NIO
-54.1%
+149.6%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | +3.4% | -2.4% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -15.5% | -0.6% | -14.9% | -15.3% |
| 30D | -22.6% | -3.5% | -19.1% | -21.8% |
| 3M | -5.7% | -30.7% | +24.9% | +3.1% |
| 6M | +43.1% | -45.6% | +88.7% | +65.2% |
| YTD | +128.2% | -35.3% | +163.5% | +146.3% |
| 1Y | +95.5% | -53.9% | +149.4% | +155.7% |
| All | +95.5% | -54.1% | +149.6% | +155.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling