+348.0%
AMD vs LQD
+15.7%
+332.3%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LQD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -0.4% | +3.0% | +3.2% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -0.8% | -0.2% | +0.1% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -1.9% | -6.8% | -6.1% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -2.7% | +139.0% | +145.6% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -1.3% | +124.3% | +128.3% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | 0.0% | +195.2% | +197.2% |
| All | +348.0% | +15.7% | +332.3% | +281.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LQD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LQD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LQD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LQD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling