+301.8%
AMD vs LPLA
+36.1%
+265.8%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.0% | -1.8% | +12.8% | +11.6% |
| 7D | -11.0% | +4.1% | -15.2% | -12.1% |
| 30D | -30.5% | -9.0% | -21.5% | -28.8% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -17.6% | +9.4% | -3.1% |
| 6M | +6.6% | -8.8% | +15.4% | +7.4% |
| YTD | +109.7% | -17.0% | +126.7% | +117.6% |
| 1Y | +88.9% | -20.4% | +109.3% | +100.4% |
| 3Y | +301.8% | +35.4% | +266.4% | +256.1% |
| All | +301.8% | +36.1% | +265.8% | +256.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling