+373.4%
AMD vs LNT
+67.8%
+305.6%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.3% | +0.5% | +6.8% | +7.4% |
| 7D | +13.1% | -0.2% | +13.3% | +13.0% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +11.6% | -18.6% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +16.6% | +8.2% | +8.4% | +18.5% |
| 6M | +20.5% | +3.1% | +17.4% | +21.6% |
| YTD | +158.2% | +16.8% | +141.4% | +159.9% |
| 1Y | +132.8% | +11.6% | +121.2% | +134.8% |
| All | +373.4% | +67.8% | +305.6% | +413.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling