+394.5%
AMD vs KRMN
+49.0%
+345.5%
-37.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.3% | +1.8% | +5.5% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +13.1% | +30.8% | -17.7% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +40.2% | -47.1% | -15.3% |
| 3M | +16.6% | -27.8% | +44.4% | +23.7% |
| 6M | +20.5% | -24.0% | +44.5% | +23.7% |
| YTD | +158.2% | -38.9% | +197.1% | +173.6% |
| 1Y | +132.8% | -35.6% | +168.4% | +140.2% |
| All | +394.5% | +49.0% | +345.5% | +244.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling