+327.1%
AMD vs KRMN
+33.3%
+293.9%
-31.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -1.3% | +6.0% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -12.3% | +14.8% | +5.8% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -27.5% | +26.5% | +6.8% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -26.5% | +17.8% | -2.8% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -59.6% | +195.9% | +191.7% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -45.4% | +168.4% | +147.8% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | -25.1% | +220.3% | +191.1% |
| All | +327.1% | +33.3% | +293.9% | +212.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling