+261.9%
AMD vs IBM
+83.3%
+178.6%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IBM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.3% | -2.8% | -14.4% | -16.6% |
| 7D | -28.6% | -4.3% | -24.3% | -27.7% |
| 30D | -37.7% | +11.7% | -49.4% | -39.2% |
| 3M | -16.1% | +5.5% | -21.6% | -17.2% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +9.5% | +4.4% | +3.4% |
| YTD | +88.8% | -14.9% | +103.7% | +92.4% |
| 1Y | +57.8% | -17.4% | +75.1% | +63.6% |
| All | +261.9% | +83.3% | +178.6% | +116.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling