+331.1%
AMD vs HTZ
-86.4%
+417.5%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +1.3% | +3.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +7.5% | -4.9% | +2.2% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +47.4% | -48.4% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -54.9% | +46.2% | -6.0% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -47.0% | +183.3% | +141.0% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -55.3% | +178.2% | +128.8% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | -57.6% | +252.8% | +201.7% |
| All | +331.1% | -86.4% | +417.5% | +390.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling