+307.6%
AMD vs GLXY
+12.0%
+295.5%
-27.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -0.6% | +5.3% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +13.4% | -10.9% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +38.1% | -39.0% | -11.9% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -7.3% | -1.4% | -8.6% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +8.2% | +128.2% | +123.1% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +17.8% | +105.2% | +99.9% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +14.9% | +180.3% | +178.8% |
| All | +307.6% | +12.0% | +295.5% | +281.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling