+294.2%
AMD vs FLNC
-69.1%
+363.3%
-65.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +1.5% | +3.2% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -4.9% | +7.4% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -27.3% | +26.3% | +6.1% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -61.9% | +53.2% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -34.5% | +170.8% | +145.4% |
| YTD | +123.0% | -47.7% | +170.7% | +138.1% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +53.3% | +141.8% | +138.5% |
| 3Y | +336.3% | -62.4% | +398.8% | +309.2% |
| All | +294.2% | -69.1% | +363.3% | +239.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling