+295.7%
AMD vs EAT
+507.6%
-211.9%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.0% | -2.9% | +13.9% | +11.7% |
| 7D | -11.0% | -2.6% | -8.4% | -10.5% |
| 30D | -30.5% | +11.5% | -41.9% | -32.1% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -9.1% | +0.9% | -6.9% |
| 6M | +6.6% | +40.4% | -33.9% | -4.3% |
| YTD | +109.7% | +43.9% | +65.7% | +85.5% |
| 1Y | +88.9% | +101.9% | -13.0% | +50.9% |
| All | +295.7% | +507.6% | -211.9% | +136.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling