+331.1%
AMD vs EAT
+611.4%
-280.3%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +0.6% | +4.1% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +2.6% | 0.0% | +2.6% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +1.9% | -2.8% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -8.7% | +68.7% | -77.4% | -21.2% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +66.9% | +69.4% | +102.4% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +60.4% | +62.6% | +92.8% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +44.0% | +151.2% | +161.2% |
| All | +331.1% | +611.4% | -280.3% | +127.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling