+331.1%
AMD vs BTDR
-2.0%
+333.1%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +3.9% | +0.7% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +20.0% | -17.4% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +11.9% | -12.9% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -36.9% | +28.2% | -3.3% |
| 6M | +136.3% | +56.5% | +79.8% | +118.5% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +10.4% | +112.6% | +114.6% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +3.1% | +192.1% | +182.6% |
| All | +331.1% | -2.0% | +333.1% | +251.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling