+373.4%
AMD vs BIIB
+13.5%
+359.9%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.3% | +0.1% | +7.3% | +7.3% |
| 7D | +13.1% | -0.4% | +13.5% | +13.2% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +10.5% | -17.4% | -7.7% |
| 3M | +16.6% | +24.3% | -7.7% | +13.9% |
| 6M | +20.5% | +28.0% | -7.5% | +16.6% |
| YTD | +158.2% | +44.0% | +114.2% | +143.1% |
| 1Y | +132.8% | +58.8% | +74.0% | +113.4% |
| All | +373.4% | +13.5% | +359.9% | +277.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling