+331.1%
AMD vs ACGL
+34.2%
+296.9%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -1.7% | +6.4% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -0.7% | +3.3% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -1.0% | +0.1% | -1.1% |
| 3M | -8.7% | +11.0% | -19.8% | -8.1% |
| 6M | +136.3% | -0.3% | +136.7% | +137.6% |
| YTD | +123.0% | +2.3% | +120.7% | +123.3% |
| 1Y | +195.2% | +6.4% | +188.8% | +193.5% |
| All | +331.1% | +34.2% | +296.9% | +293.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling