+4.6%
AMCR vs NIO
-64.4%
+68.9%
-32.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -2.4% | -0.4% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -6.3% | -4.1% | -2.1% | -6.0% |
| 30D | -7.1% | -23.2% | +16.1% | -5.4% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -29.9% | +42.6% | +15.4% |
| 6M | +5.2% | -25.1% | +30.3% | +6.8% |
| YTD | +8.1% | -27.5% | +35.5% | +9.9% |
| 1Y | +10.0% | -41.1% | +51.1% | +13.2% |
| All | +4.6% | -64.4% | +68.9% | +9.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling