-97.7%
AMC vs TSLQ
-97.6%
-0.1%
-99.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TSLQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.3% | -11.1% | +19.4% | +6.7% |
| 7D | +6.6% | +8.5% | -1.9% | +8.8% |
| 30D | +14.1% | -4.8% | +18.9% | +14.7% |
| 3M | +31.3% | -34.9% | +66.1% | +26.0% |
| 6M | +126.7% | -10.6% | +137.3% | +132.1% |
| YTD | +117.9% | -13.4% | +131.3% | +126.7% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | -25.9% | +67.0% | +44.1% |
| 3Y | -61.0% | -96.9% | +36.0% | -73.3% |
| All | -97.7% | -97.6% | -0.1% | -98.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TSLQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TSLQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TSLQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TSLQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling