-71.3%
AMC vs TRGP
+218.9%
-290.3%
-91.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -2.7% | +4.6% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -16.0% | +18.6% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -6.4% | +15.5% | +8.5% |
| 3M | +22.2% | -1.0% | +23.1% | +21.8% |
| 6M | +91.5% | +7.0% | +84.5% | +89.6% |
| YTD | +101.3% | +46.1% | +55.2% | +91.8% |
| 1Y | +20.8% | +58.7% | -37.9% | +13.7% |
| 3Y | -71.3% | +221.9% | -293.2% | -75.9% |
| All | -71.3% | +218.9% | -290.3% | -75.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling