-80.6%
AMC vs TRGP
+252.7%
-333.3%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.2% | +5.5% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +0.8% | +1.5% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -0.7% | +11.5% | -12.3% | -1.0% |
| 3M | +35.2% | +9.0% | +26.2% | +34.8% |
| 6M | +124.6% | +20.5% | +104.1% | +120.7% |
| YTD | +69.9% | +59.5% | +10.3% | +59.8% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | +77.9% | -80.5% | -10.5% |
| All | -80.6% | +252.7% | -333.3% | -85.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling